<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SECOND CHILDISHNESS AND MERE OBLIVION</title>
	<atom:link href="http://desperationandnoise.com/2009/11/02/second-childishness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://desperationandnoise.com/2009/11/02/second-childishness/</link>
	<description>on bizarre musical creatures that wriggle and scream themselves into existence.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brad Nelson</title>
		<link>http://desperationandnoise.com/2009/11/02/second-childishness/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desperationandnoise.com/?p=3302#comment-328</guid>
		<description>The reason there are three different takes of everything (which is the reason why editing was &lt;i&gt;stupid as fuck&lt;/i&gt;) is because there are long pauses in each take that are best filled by abrupt cutting to another. There was also a lot of jumping from topic to topic: Two takes meant to be on the same subject achieved very different ends (neither made it into the final video). The sedate quality is a result of this being filmed at 3 a.m. In other words, I think you could totally pull this off Andrew and I think it would be completely awesome.

The Daniel Johnston comparison is spot-on, even down to the sound of the record, except Johnston would be a return to childhood as a way of expelling the devil from his body. Also, just an aside, but what I failed to mention here is that despite my painting of this record as distinct in the Beach Boys discography, there&#039;s clear antecedents in stuff like &quot;Vegetables.&quot; This is just a further extreme down the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason there are three different takes of everything (which is the reason why editing was <i>stupid as fuck</i>) is because there are long pauses in each take that are best filled by abrupt cutting to another. There was also a lot of jumping from topic to topic: Two takes meant to be on the same subject achieved very different ends (neither made it into the final video). The sedate quality is a result of this being filmed at 3 a.m. In other words, I think you could totally pull this off Andrew and I think it would be completely awesome.</p>
<p>The Daniel Johnston comparison is spot-on, even down to the sound of the record, except Johnston would be a return to childhood as a way of expelling the devil from his body. Also, just an aside, but what I failed to mention here is that despite my painting of this record as distinct in the Beach Boys discography, there&#8217;s clear antecedents in stuff like &#8220;Vegetables.&#8221; This is just a further extreme down the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://desperationandnoise.com/2009/11/02/second-childishness/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desperationandnoise.com/?p=3302#comment-327</guid>
		<description>Two things:

1) maybe it&#039;s the result of editing but when I was watching this I kept thinking &quot;No way could I speak extemporaneously in this way and come out sounding this coherent and pretty much like I was speaking something I&#039;d normally write.&quot; I&#039;d probably jump from topic to topic constantly and forget what I&#039;d started with and have to edit in resolutions to the points I originally tried to make and then forgot about. Also, I&#039;d be way less sedate. I&#039;d probably come off like Denis Leary in those old commercials he did for MTV.

2) As for that Beach Boys record, a great deal of what you had to say about the lyrical content, the sound, and what it all added up to express reminded me strongly of Daniel Johnston&#039;s work. It makes me wonder what the results would have been if Daniel Johnston had had stage parents the way Brian Wilson did. I dunno, do you see the comparison between the two?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things:</p>
<p>1) maybe it&#8217;s the result of editing but when I was watching this I kept thinking &#8220;No way could I speak extemporaneously in this way and come out sounding this coherent and pretty much like I was speaking something I&#8217;d normally write.&#8221; I&#8217;d probably jump from topic to topic constantly and forget what I&#8217;d started with and have to edit in resolutions to the points I originally tried to make and then forgot about. Also, I&#8217;d be way less sedate. I&#8217;d probably come off like Denis Leary in those old commercials he did for MTV.</p>
<p>2) As for that Beach Boys record, a great deal of what you had to say about the lyrical content, the sound, and what it all added up to express reminded me strongly of Daniel Johnston&#8217;s work. It makes me wonder what the results would have been if Daniel Johnston had had stage parents the way Brian Wilson did. I dunno, do you see the comparison between the two?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
